Theatre reviews roundup: Hamlet

Not to be

Lyttelton, National Theatre
Hiran Abeysekera in Hamlet. Photo: Sam Taylor

After Bacchae provided a faltering start to Indhu Rubasingham’s launch season, she might have hoped her deputy Artistic Director Robert Hastie would get it back on track by directing a memorable modern dress Hamlet. Sadly, it was not to be. The Olivier Award-winning Hiran Abeysekera was thought by most reviewers to be fast and funny at the expense of the play’s depth. One bright point was the praise heaped on Francesca Mills’ Ophelia.

[Links to full reviews are included but a number are behind paywalls and therefore may not be accessible]

5 stars ⭑⭑

For Debbie Gilpin at BroadwayWorld, ‘This is exactly the kind of Hamlet you would hope to see at The National Theatre. Challenging, entertaining, and compelling, it takes one of the most well-known plays in the English language and shows us something new.’ The main reason she was an outlier in her five star review is that she had a different opinion to other critics on Hiran Abeysekera’s hyperactive approach to the part: ‘We recognise now that grief can manifest itself in many different ways, so our titular prince doesn’t have to mope around and be visibly melancholic throughout the play; he can outwardly appear to be coping, whilst his interior monologue says all sorts of things. As an audience we are given an insight into this via his soliloquies, which almost spill out of him at times – Hiran Abeysekera’s Hamlet’s mind is working at 100mph as it tries to process everything that’s going on around him. There’s a ring of truth to this, as your mouth can often struggle to keep up with your brain in times of stress.’ She falls in line with the others in her opinion of Francesca Mills’ Ophelia: ‘her breakdown is all-consuming and visceral, the raw emotion from Mills enough to shatter even the iciest of hearts.’

3 stars

‘It’s very funny but does it mean anything?’ wrote Andrjez Lukowksi at TimeOut, ‘I’m not sure it does. Abeysekera’s character basically seems to be ‘crazy guy’, which is entertaining scene to scene but it’s hard to remain sympathetic or invested in his fate as he ruins an ever increasing number of lives without a twinge of self-doubt.’

The Standard‘s Nick Curtis had this insight: ‘Hiran Abeysekera brings a manic, impulsive, boyish energy to Shakespeare’s Hamlet in Robert Hastie’s uneven production. It’s the first I’ve seen that implies the 30-year-old prince has ADHD or some similar disorder. This arguably makes sense of the character’s mood swings, his introspection and inertia, and his complete inability to read a room or recognise others’ emotional needs.’ As for the production as a whole:’Hastie’s interpretation is full of novel ideas and subtly revelatory touches but feels ponderous and staid overall.’

Anya Ryan for LondonTheatre picked out many qualities, such as: ‘Abeysekera is marvellous as the Danish prince – impish, breathless and full of new ideas. Visually, too, everything is done well.’ But she was confused: ‘It’s an active, pacy production that doesn’t pause for breath. And all of it makes for a perfectly pleasant night out at the theatre. But with so many ideas thrown at it with no explanation, it remains unclear what Hastie is actually trying to say.’

WhatsOnStage’s Sarah Crompton disagreed: ‘Hastie has provided a handsome, clear-sighted production.’ However, ‘It’s original to see a Hamlet who isn’t a melancholic poet, but the disadvantage of the approach is that it strips the play of its thoughtful centre.’ She thought: ‘Francesca Mills’s Ophelia…brings this intelligent, thoughtful production to its most vivid life.’

The Guardian’s Arifa Akbar agreed about Ophelia: ‘Mills …steals the show with her astonishing portrayal of Ophelia’. She summed up the production as ‘a well-put together, beautifully choreographed production but one with a frustrating emotional vacuum at its centre.’

Dominic Cavendish in the Telegraph was disappointed with Hiran Abeysekera: ‘In broad terms, he contends capably with the heaving cargo of lines yet goes overboard with his frenzied attacks on the soliloquies, rushing trains of thought so you’re left short-changed of lyrical beauty and psychological insight. For all his charisma, the evening winds up fast-paced but fatally unmoving.’ ‘The noble idea implicit in the production that “anyone” can play Hamlet translates into something too conversationally workaday.’ Like others, he reserved his highest praise for a relatively minor part : ‘The true star of the night is Francesca Mills, who is an irresistible and irrepressible Ophelia, every line, and look, hits home. The actor, who has a form of dwarfism, commands the stage’.

The i’s Fiona Mountford started with praise: ‘Where Hastie scores most highly is in the sense of hurtling momentum that his slick and sinuous production creates’. She had mixed feelings about the star: ‘Abeysekera gives his tortured modern prince a manic energy and a smile of deep existential emptiness…but the performance is let down by the fact that he takes the soliloquies at an almighty lick, racing through “To be or not to be” with little sense of truth or profundity. This lack of gravitas creeps insidiously outwards to colour everything else’.

The Independent‘s Alice Saville took a different slant: ‘it does feel fitting that this Hamlet’s catharsis should come through laughter, not through mass murder. It creates a posh, slick, morally bankrupt vision of a court that takes nothing seriously, until they’re forced to. And in a theatre climate where showy, weighty revivals of Shakespeare with big stars and massive concepts are the norm, it’s a reminder that a lighter touch can be powerful, too.’

2 stars

Dave Fargnoli of The Stage stuck the sword in. Here are some of the elements of the production he skewered: ‘After a taut, promisingly eerie opening sequence, the production loses momentum, lurching to a boisterous modern wedding scene full of recognisably awkward family interactions, then on to a half-hearted stab at the palace intrigue’; ‘Hiran Abeysekera is a manic, wild-eyed Hamlet, more stand-up comedian than prince. He races through his lines in a breathless blur, rarely pausing to consider the intention behind his words, but straining to turn everything into a joke as a defence mechanism, quipping and mugging to the audience’; ‘its lack of focus means it never grips as it should’.

The Times‘ Clive Davis was another strong critic: ‘Hiran Abeysekera spends so much time smirking and joshing with the audience that it’s hard to care what happens to him in that final duel.’ He still had fresh in his mind Giles Terera’s triumphant Hamlet in Chichester: ‘Abeysekera — who, to be fair, does look every bit the wayward student — possesses a thinner voice and rattles along at such a frantic tempo that the effect is like listening to a podcast where someone has been toying with the speed settings.’ He summed up: ‘we’re left with a fitful evening that lurches from one lush tableau to another.’

Critics’ Average Rating 3.0⭑

Value rating 43

Hamlet can be seen at the National Theatre until 22 November 2025. Buy tickets direct from the theatre.

If you’ve seen Hamlet at the National Theatre, please add your rating and review below

5 Replies to “Theatre reviews roundup: Hamlet”

  1. I’m with BroadwayWorld. Was Press night an off-night? I’ve seen ALL of the National Hamlets since 1963 and this was up there with the best. A bracing breeze is blowing through the corridors of Elsinore and Hiran Abeysekera in the title role is a revelation – fragile, troubled and intense, he talks, shouts, muses in anguish to himself and us, ensuring everyone pays him attention (especially the audience). I watched captivated, drawn in to his fraying world. Seldom has Hamlet, both play and character, been so exhilarating. This is the most intelligent, detailed and exciting revisionist production of Hamlet you are ever likely to see. It plays fair with the text and gets real with its players. Students we met there, all studying various aspects of Theatre, were totally enthralled. And that, I suggest, is what really matters.

    1. Totally agree. By the time I saw it last Saturday, they had found their rhythm and I thought it was an excellent production. I loved Abeysekera. He was charismatic and intelligent and original as Hamlet. The production was clear and a real pleasure to watch.

  2. I think nerves must have got the better of everyone on press night. Maybe Abeysekera did rush his lines that night, but I saw this on Saturday 8th November and he was brilliant and charismatic and a breath of fresh air. I felt every word he uttered to be nuanced and purposeful. I understood the play in a way I never have before and actually feel that some of the slightly slapstick gestures and humour helped in the interpretation. I’ve seen other Hamlets including Ben Wishaw in the title role many moons ago, but this one made the most sense to me. I loved the soliloquys, and really understood the play for the first time. Claudius and Laertes were fine, Gertrude and Ophelia were a tiny bit shouty and less nuanced and fragile than I might have liked, but the beauty of the language and imagery was absolutely delivered, and the sets worked well, and as a whole it was a really satisfying rendition. Wong as Horatio was excellent and a pleasure to watch. The diversity of the cast was crude on one level but a great revelation too and testament to the universality of Shakespeare’s themes and stories. He belongs to us all.

  3. We walked out after the first act. Absurdity of the production was only enhanced by the garbled lines of lovely language, which commandeered the director & cast’s performance into a colossal shipwreck of moral confusion. It felt like a series of bulldozers, driven by the cast, being directed to destroy everything about the play that makes it what it is and has been over the centuries. History and moral clarity be dammed, fuck off reflection, language, concepts, ideas, and emotions of the author and previous efforts, leaving nothing but an empty shell. While I protest too much, it may seem, channeling the current zeitgeist of dismissive ‘modernism’ for a performative show of cynicism was not remotely interesting or refreshing to this theatregoer.
    The most amusing event was another audience member bringing out his tub of Kentucky Fried Chicken at the break.

Comments are closed.

×