Life imitating art- entertaining or boring

Hampstead Theatre

Sarah Ruhl‘s play Stage Kiss went down well in the US, so the UK premiere was much anticipated. In the event, the critics’ reaction was lukewarm. The play includes two plays-within-the-play which involve amusing parodies of rehearsals and the acting world. It also delved into the way emotion from art and real life can get confused, by us as well as the people on stage. Some critics thought this worked (‘profound..entertaining’ Time Out), others didn’t (‘borders on the bland, bloviating, and boring’ BroadwayWorld). The cast were praised: Myanna Buring as She, Patrick Kennedy as He, Rolf Saxon as The Director, Oliver Dimsdale as The Husband. The production is directed by Blanche McIntyre.

[Links to full reviews are included but a number are behind paywalls and therefore may not be accessible]

4 stars ⭑⭑⭑⭑

Nina Culley for Time Out found: ‘The dialogue is zigzagging, joyfully absurd with the right amount of twists. The tension between the hamminess of Act One and the grit of Act Two is a juxtaposition rarely staged this openly – and if it never quite commits to either, Ruhl’s comedy holds it together. In the end, what Stage Kiss leaves you with is something approximately profound, but above all, very entertaining.’

The Times’ Clive Davis called it a ‘light but droll comedy (that) delights in playing games with the audience.’ ‘Ruhl has enormous fun sending up the conventions of a period piece where a maid makes hurried entrances and the leads utter clipped, pseudo-worldly dialogue before breaking into the occasional song.‘ ‘MyAnna Buring and Patrick Kennedy are perfectly poised as the lovers. Rolf Saxon quietly steals scenes as the director, while the multitasking James Phoon wins well-deserved laughter as an inept understudy. Blanche McIntyre’s direction is attentive to every comic detail’. He ended: ‘Just when you think Ruhl is losing focus, you realise that she is still toying with us.’

Helen Hawkins at The Arts Desk spoke of Ruhl ‘niftily juggling meta themes with standard comedy of manners tropes as she probes the line where real life blurs with stage life. She brings a sly but warm, grounded humour to the material that allows the audience to sit back and enjoy the ride.’

’It’s playful but sincerely meditative’ summed up Miriam Sallon for WhatsOnStage.

3 stars ⭑⭑⭑

The Standard’s Nick Curtis noted: ‘There’s an interesting idea here, I think, about how we use actors as proxies to explore how life should be lived. But it gets stomped on by the galumphing comic business, which includes toppling pot-plants, onstage injuries and misfiring props, and the knowing staginess of it all.’

Dave Fargnoli of The Stage found: ‘While Buring and Kennedy nail the humour of their roles, the chemistry between them never quite convinces, always feeling strained. More believable and tender is She’s attachment to her husband, the surprisingly humble finance bro Harrison – given an aura of quiet acceptance by Oliver Dimsdale.’

2 stars ⭑⭑

Lucinda Everett for The Guardian liked the earlier part of the evening but: ‘Stage Kiss also has its sights set on the interplay between art and life – specifically whether onstage romance can conjure real feelings – and here it comes unstuck, thanks to some pointed but unsteady metatheatricality.’

Cindy Marcolina at BroadwayWorld didn’t pull her punches: ‘this is an uncomplicated, easy, unchallenging comedy for the easily pleased that borders on the bland, bloviating, and boring. Not only it’s too melodramatic for what it is, but it also contains so much surplus material that its two-hours-ten-including-an-interval could be streamlined into a 90-minute-straight-through by a dramaturg.’

Critics’ average rating 3.3⭑

Stage Kiss can be seen at Hampstead Theatre until 13 June 2026.  Buy tickets directly from the theatre

If you’ve seen Stage Kiss, please post your review and rating here

An evening in the presence of greatness

Royal Court Theatre

An hour an ten minutes might not constitute a full evening’s entertainment for some but for the critics it was a case of quality not quantity in this Beckett themed double bill. The main attraction was Gary Oldman who directed, designed and starred in Samuel Beckett’s Krapp’s Last Tape, which premiered at Theatre Royal York. All the critics, with one exception, lavished praise on his portrayal of an old man listening to himself on tape 30 years earlier and displaying surprise and disappointment at how life hasn’t turned out as he expected. The critics’ awe at being in the presence of Mr Oldman extended to universal references to his role as Jackson Lamb in Slow Horses, and the fact that the tape recorder was also used by Michael Gambon and John Hurt when they played Krapp.
The curtain raiser was a new play by 19 year old  Leo Simpe-Asante called Godot’s To-Do List, which was generally well received. In it, a young Godot (Shakeel Haakim) is detained by a voice giving him tasks to perform.

[Links to full reviews are included but a number are behind paywalls and therefore may not be accessible]

4 stars ⭑⭑⭑⭑

BroadwayWorld’s Aliya Al-Hassan was entranced by Oldman: ‘His performance in Krapp’s Last Tape is mesmerising: the role requires the actor to bring so much to the act of a cough, a sigh or eating a banana (or three) and Oldman imbues all actions with huge purpose’…(He) displays huge vocal skill; the recordings of his younger voice have a brighter, more lyrical tone, contrasting with the creaky gruffness of older age.’ She gave three stars to Godot’s To-Do List: ‘a fun and quirky opener’.

The Standard’s Nick Curtis analysed Gary Oldman’s performance: ‘Oldman’s Krapp (the scatology is deliberate) is a layered, nuanced investigation of Beckett’s low-key miniature. He mines pathos and comedy from a softening of the eyes or a tightening of the mouth as much as from the scanty text (…) watching Oldman eat a banana is mesmerising. The first thing Krapp does is devour two of them, deliberately and with relish. Emotions chase each other across his face: greed, melancholy, guilt (…) The ending, when Oldman stares ahead as the light dwindles on the quietly turning tape spools before him, is magnificent.’

The Independent’s Alice Saville pointed out: ‘This play is Beckett at his brilliant, merciless best, and Oldman’s staging brings out all its cruelty by showing how utterly destroyed Krapp has been by his own self-deluded ambitions (…) It takes a lot of genius and a lot of experience to convey oceans of complexity in a few short words – and Oldman’s return to Beckett does just that. It’s a profoundly weighty half an hour, saturated in regret and loathing for the youthful hubris that’s gone before.‘ She was critical of the choice of opener: ‘there’s also a juvenile crassness to its jokes about pig orgasms, and a flimsiness to its structure that can’t stand up to Beckett’s masterfully constructed monologue.’

The Telegraph’s Dominic Cavendish noted: ‘as he cradles the old reel-to-reel kit, and listens intently, and inscrutably, it’s as if Oldman’s derelict, largely desk-bound figure is trying – impossibly – to spirit himself into the words, and the warmer past, itself.’ He called Godot’s To Do List ‘simple but inspired’.

The Stage’s Sam Marlowe welcomed: ‘all the skill and presence you’d expect from Oldman is very much in evidence; bleakly absorbing.’ She commented on Godot’s To-Do List: ‘ Simpe-Asante has a confident command of theatrical gesture and language, and Haakim is engaging as the confounded everyman Godot.‘

Chris Wiegand of The Guardian thought the new play a worthy opener:  ‘Simpe-Asante laughingly considers, yet crucially does so with compassion, the sense that any of us could ever wield any kind of control in this world. It shows, at one point quite literally, a futile search to be in sync with your surroundings.’ About Krapp he said: ‘Oldman’s direction delicately captures a sense of nightfall, with the dying moments of Malcolm Rippeth’s lighting design creating a terrible pathos (…) A stillness concealing tumult is exactly what Oldman’s expression captures as the machine whirs almost like lapping water, and he picks over what is left behind in life when the tide goes out.’ Perhaps in an attempt to having to provide an average rating, Mr Wiegand gave no rating. I’ve assumed 4 stars because that was his rating when he saw it in York.

Tim Bano for The Financial Times commented on the curtain raiser: ‘You could read it as a piece about the tyranny of tech, how our watches now tell us when to stand up; you can see it as a warning about our inability to enjoy the present moment. Wry and smart, it finally explodes into a Beckettian flash of words about the meaning of existence.’  As part of his analysis of Oldman’s performance in Krapp’s Last Tape, he noted: ‘you can almost see those small scenes from his life drift across his eyes, his face responding with expressions of fondness, then dismissal, before a final staring sadness as he fades slowly to black.’

‘Simpe-Asante has created something fresh and modern’ noted Olivia Rook at LondonTheatre before moving on to the main event: ‘It is an understated performance that requires patience from its audience — much of the time Oldman is chuckling or grunting at something his former self has said; in other moments, he sits in silence.’

3 stars ⭑⭑⭑

Was the lavish praise of Gary Oldman in the 4-star reviews a case of the Emperor’s new clothes (or in this case a Jackson Lamb style ‘grubby shirt’)? The Times’ Clive Davis declared himself ‘slightly underwhelmed’.  He noted: ‘Much of the time Oldman strikes impassive gestures as he spools back and forth on his old school reel-to-reel machine’. He liked the opener: ‘a little like hearing the lugubrious Beckett given a generous dose of laughing gas.’

Critics’ average rating 3.9⭑

Krapp’s Last Tape can be seen at the Royal Court theatre until 30 May 2026. It’s sold out but returns and Monday rush tickets may be available from royalcourttheatre.com

If you’ve seen this double bill at the Royal Court, please leave a review and/or rating below

Happy Dream

Shakespeare’s Globe

Only a few months after The Globe’s last Dream, not to mention the Bridge’s revival of their Dream and an RSC production at The Barbican, London has yet another version of Shakespeare’s popular comedy. Only this time it’s less dark and a lot more frivolous, as all the critics agreed. Emily Lim has a reputation for involving communities in theatre, and she applies her skills and experience to a production that involves the Globe audience in a lot of fun.

[Links to full reviews are included but a number are behind paywalls and therefore may not be accessible]

4 stars ⭑⭑⭑⭑

Miriam Gillinson for The Guardian loved it: ‘It’s generous, creative and clever, always with an eye to making the audience feel included. With gloriously extravagant costumes (concept by Fly Davis), a set that spontaneously blooms from designer Aldo Vázquez, hearty folk music by Jim Fortune and effervescent comic performances, this is the rarest of things: a Dream the whole family can enjoy.’

Rachel Halliburton at The Arts Desk declared: ‘It’s a Dream that’s very much in the Globe’s tradition of crowd-pleasing entertainment, filled with music, laughter, and appropriately absurd audience participation.’

LondonTheatre’s Aliya Al-Hassan was transported: ‘It’s true that we never feel the nervousness of the lovers alone in the forest, nor any of the potentially unsettling aspects of the text. But shying away from the darker sides of the play feels more than appropriate for these troubled times, and this Dream is perfectly frivolous summer fare.’

Clementine Scott at BroadwayWorld felt: ‘This version of Dream is something close to a folk musical, with original songs by Jim Fortune. The inherent artificiality of musical theatre, breaking into song and such, works well with the general sense of performance, and of witnessing some sort of deftly choreographed ritual.’

Time Out’s Andrzej Lukowski was charmed: ‘it uses the Globe’s large, lairy crowd to maximum impact for a production that cheerily deviates repeatedly from Shakespeare’s exact text in a joyous, almost non-stop welter of audience interaction.’

The Standard’s Nick Curtissurprised himself: ‘It can be played dark or light. In Lim’s hands it’s a sunny show, decked with trippy flowers and colourful costumes, where the undercurrent of horror is only faintly implied. There’s copious audience participation, however, which is usually my very idea of horror but works surprisingly well here.’

Calling it ‘irresistible fun’, The Financial Times’ Sarah Hemming said the production ‘emphasises the theatricality and communality of Shakespeare’s comedy. Lim, who has previously worked on large-scale public-interaction theatrical works, foregrounds the role-play in the story and celebrates the transient community created by live theatre.’ She noted: ‘In the programme, Lim talks about “joy as a radical act” that can bind communities together. That’s what she delivers, and it feels pretty necessary right now. ‘

The Times’ Dominic Maxwell praised: ‘Grady-Hall…proves a clown of twinkling restraint. I say “restraint” — his Puck sports green tights adorned by table-tennis balls. Yet he plies his quirkiness calmly and plays the audience like a musical instrument as he encourages different sections to sing different notes on his cue. And that’s the key to the success of an evening that’s not so much good drama as a good time.’

Theo Bosanquet for WhatsOnStage overcame his reservations: ‘it feels the narrative is sublimated to the showmanship, the darker and more poetic aspects of the play drowned out in a (literal) sea of bubbles. But this is forgivable in a version that feels unapologetically fun, escapist and, I daresay, well-judged for the current times.’

3 stars ⭑⭑⭑

The Telegraph’s Dominic Cavendish was the only notable critic not to immerse himself in the lovefest, describing it as a ‘rainbow-colourful, strenuously frisky al fresco version, glutted with audience participation. Yet, for all the admirable industry and invention of Emily Lim’s production, at times I felt as if I’d been trapped in Butlin’s rather than spirited away to an enchanted forest outside Athens (…) The cast seem to be having a ball – many Globe-goers will, too. I just wish there was a bit more trust in the Bard to work his own magic.’

Critics’ average rating 3.9⭑

A Midsummer Night’s Dream can be seen at Shakespeare’s Globe until 29 August 2026. Buy tickets directly from the theatre.

If you’ve seen this production ofA Midsummer Night’s Dream at Shakespeare’s Globe, please leave your review and/or rating below

Ralph Fiennes’ love letter to theatre

Theatre Royal Haymarket

A second David Hare play hits the West End. Grace Pervades, transferring from Theatre Royal Bath, is very different to Teeth ‘n’ Smiles, the latter centring on a 60s rock band, the former on the leading 19th century actors Ellen Terry and Henry Irving. It seems superfluous to say that the two leads Miranda Raison and Ralph Fiennes received high praise. The critics’ reaction to David Hare was more mixed (‘great humour and excellent control’ WhatsOnStage); ‘It’s easy to admire the craft here, but you engage at a distance’ (The Stage).

Links to full reviews are included but a number are behind paywalls and therefore may not be accessible]

4 stars ⭑⭑⭑⭑

WhatOnStage’s Sarah Crompton declared: ‘Hare writes a love letter to theatre itself, at a time when it was defining its journey into the next century. He does so with great humour and excellent control, beautifully conducted by director Jeremy Herrin.’

The Times’ Clive Davis was diverted by it : ‘It’s a quirky, anecdotal piece which, at its best, is much more amusing than you might expect.’  It was, he said, ‘An evening that celebrates the art of illusion weaves one shimmering backdrop after another.’

The Telegraph‘s Dominic Cavendish thought: ‘David Hare’s genteel homage to (Terry and Irving), and to the changing face of theatre itself, elicits a delightful double-act from Ralph Fiennes and Miranda Raison; he the model of distinguished propriety, she the radiant antidote.’

3 stars ⭑⭑⭑

Broadway World’s Aliya Al-Hussain wrote about the leads: ‘Ralph Fiennes and Miranda Raison are beautifully paired as the couple, with Raison’s Ellen giving warmth and encouragement to Fiennes’s intense and serious Henry’; ‘Raison radiates life and ambition; her world view is much broader than just the theatre and she reflects that life experience on stage.’

Julia Rank at LondonTheatre pointed out: ‘Jeremy Herrin’s production is on the leisurely side and indulges Hare’s tendency towards exposition, with some unnecessary interludes. We’re informed that Irving and Terry were magic in performance and it’s a mistake to try to recreate snatches of their most famous Shakespearean roles with a style that now comes across as mannered.’

Tom Wicker from The Stage said: ‘Raison is luminescent as Hare’s take on Terry, bringing a quicksilver intelligence and a hard-won smile in the face of challenges.’ But he thought: ‘Hare’s writing is typically elegant and artful. It’s as carefully framed as Herrin’s staging…It’s easy to admire the craft here, but you engage at a distance.’

The Standard’s Nick Curtis called it ‘a warm, entertaining love-letter to a blended family of British theatrical pioneers, in which Ralph Fiennes sends himself up delightfully.’ He concluded: ‘Some may wonder why the once-radical Hare is wallowing in heritage theatre, but in fact this is anything but. Under all the period trappings and self-referential lines it’s a celebration of the protean spirit of the stage and the committed, charismatic, animating figures – like Irving and Fiennes – who keep it alive and push it forward. Sit back, relax, enjoy.’

Tim Bano at Time Out decided: ‘It’s all good fun, a cheeky, self-referential and sometimes self-critical play. Never exceptional, but nor too dull, Hare’s play becomes a sweet panegyric, and a really traditional, really entertaining night both at the theatre and of the theatre.’

2 stars ⭑⭑

The Independent’s Alice Saville counterblasted: ‘Hare clearly loves theatrical history. But he doesn’t let his audience love it too, because he’s too obsessed with overlaying it with his own agenda of old (good) versus new (diabolical). Jeremy Herrin’s production feels as stiff and mannered as the traditions that Edward Gordon Craig tried to sweep away. The new may be shocking, but at least it’s rarely quite this boring.’

Critics’ average rating 3.3⭑

Value rating 27

Grace Pervades can be seen at Theatre Royal Haymarket until 11 July 2026. Buy directly from www.gracepervadestheplay.com

If you’ve seen Grace Pervades, please leave are review and/or rating below

Definitely powerful, possibly predictable

Donmar Warehouse

Fran Kranz’s Mass, receiving its world premiere at The Donmar, is based on his film of the same name. WhatsOnStage said ‘the immense courage of people who, in real life, attempt to reach forgiveness and understanding is the propulsion for the play’. The people in question are two couples who have both lost their sons in a mass shooting, and meet in attempt at reconciliation. The critics agreed it was a gut wrenching evening, with credit given to the four lead actors: Adeel Akhtar, Monica Dolan, Paul Hilton and Lyndsey Marshal. Director Carrie Cracknell was also praised for the intensity of the production. They disagreed about the script: masterful’ (LondonTheatre), ‘predictable ‘ (The Stage).

5 stars ⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑

WhatsOnStage‘s Sarah Crompton was impressed: ‘Four people sit around a table and talk. Franz Kranz’s lacerating play Mass is built from the simplest and least theatrical of ingredients. Yet in this production, thanks to the skill of director Carrie Cracknell and the intense naturalism of its cast, it becomes something very special.’ She continued: ‘once the characters begin to speak, the essential communion of theatre works its alchemical power; it is impossible not to listen and feel the terrible moral dilemma that gradually unfolds.’ She described the lead performers in detail: ‘Akhtar makes Jay a man who is being eaten from the inside by his anger and his sense of injustice…Hilton’s Richard is similarly hollow…Dolan creates a portrait of a woman in whom sadness is stretched to breaking point…Her entire body seems taut with pain…As Gail, Marshal is equally powerful. Her face seems made of glass, emotions passing across it as she listens intently to everything that is being said.’

Cheryl Markosky for BroadwayWorld described it as ‘simple, but also searingly powerful’. She explained: ‘What it comes down to is a thoughtful script, excellent direction and brilliant performances from all of the actors. They’re all commendable ­– although Dolan is particularly phenomenal as a trembling wreck about to fall apart at any second.’ She found ‘The intimacy of the 250-seater Donmar Theatre is perfect for Mass. We’re up close with the actors, witnessing pain, horror and guilt etched on their faces. Their pain is our pain’.

4 stars ⭑⭑⭑⭑

The Guardian‘s Arifa Akbar said: ‘It is hard to beat the force and sensitive performances of Kranz’s film but Hilton is masterfully brittle, his entire being sunken with apology, while Dolan is whey-faced and shaky. The always brilliant Akhtar is angrier and edgier than his film counterpart and Marshal brings a moving softness.’

The Independent‘s Alice Saville called it ‘an agonisingly intense, beautifully performed study of a couple’s search for forgiveness.’ She concluded that the play ‘really does shine on the Donmar’s small stage, where an audience can see close-up how a single space shifts from an impersonal meeting place into an almost spiritual site of reconciliation. Words are never enough, but they can still reduce a room to tears.’

3 stars ⭑⭑⭑

Holly O’Mahony for LondonTheatre declared: ‘It’s a masterful piece of writing from Kranz: every utterance counts, and each line is a turn of a cog that keeps this grim yet poignant narrative moving.’ On the other hand: ‘However, Carrie Cracknell’s production can feel hands-off, perhaps through an intention to let the text breathe. Unlike James Graham’s Punch, which also tells a story of restorative justice, but paints a fuller picture beyond the brave meeting at its centre, here we really do just watch two sets of parents hash things out at length, which grows monotonous.’

While calling it ‘powerful stuff, for Time Out‘s Andrzej Lukowski also made the comparison: ‘the elephant in the room is James Graham’s recent Olivier-winning play Punch. The plot isn’t identical to Mass. But his Nottingham-set restorative justice drama about a killer confronting his victim’s parents is undoubtedly in the same ballpark, and it’s simply a stronger, more culturally relevant play.’

The Times’ Clive Davis thought: ‘The Donmar Warehouse is the perfect place to see a play as stark as this. The audience sit uncomfortably close to the actors, and an almost imperceptible slow revolve on Anna Yates’s set ensures that we have ample time to study the characters’ anguished reactions (…)It’s almost like reading a real-life transcript, which is both the strength and the weakness of the piece.’

The Stage‘s Sam Marlowe had a problem: ‘once we’ve got to grips with the premise, the drama can only really move in one fairly predictable direction, via pretty much all the emotional milestones you’d expect.’ Having said that, ‘Carrie Cracknell’s production is immaculate – delicate, raw, finely calibrated and faultlessly acted by a stunning cast. The sheer force of the human pain and helplessness laid before us lends the writing a propulsive power.’

Claire Allfree for the Telegraph felt let down:  ‘It’s wrenching to watch, and beautifully performed’ she said, but ‘Kranz’s play draws superficially on the moral complexity of restorative justice, but in truth merely takes the audience through the emotional gears.’  In summing up, she said it strives ‘for emotional impact at the expense of genuinely provocative ideas.’

Nick Curtis’ review in The Standard began promisingly: ‘This gruelling play…is a sincere exploration of a process of restorative justice following a US school shooting. The stage version is realised with crystalline focus by Carrie Cracknell and acted with deep, pressing conviction by a central quartet of fine actors.’ However: ‘it’s too slick, too facile, a neat emotional workout for actors and an easy win for a smugly liberal audience.’ As for the hopeful ending: ‘it feels lazy and hollow.’

Critics’ average rating 3.6⭑

The Mass can be seen at the Donmar Warehouse until 6 June 2026. Buy tickets directly from the theatre

If you’ve seen The Mass at The Donmar, please leave your review and/or rating below

Henry Goodman on top form in classic Miller

Marylebone Theatre

The small, four-year-old Marylebone Theatre has scored a coup by attracting Henry Goodman to play Gregory Solomon in Arthur Miller’s The Price. All the critics agreed that, despite him only featuring significantly in the first half, he gave a show-dominating performance (‘a riveting performance’ The Stage). Which was a shame, in a way, because the actual star of the play is Elliot Cowan (‘a towering performance’ WhatsOnStage) who, along with  John Hopkins as his brother and Faye Castelow as his wife, received high praise, just not as much as Goodman.

Solomon is an 89 year old thinking about purchasing the brothers’ late father’s furniture and possessions, while the middle-aged brothers assess the course of their lives, the choices made, the prices paid. There was a general feeling that this late play deserves to be higher up in the Miller canon (‘one of his masterpieces’ Telegraph), although there were dissenting voices (‘a sense of drag’ Time Out).

Jonathan Munby directs with a naturalistic set full of dusty junk (‘exquisitely cluttered’ WhatsOnStage) provided by Jon Bausor.

[Links to full reviews are included but a number are behind paywalls and therefore may not be accessible]

5 stars ★★★★★

The Telegraph’s Dominic Cavendish loved it: ‘The Price is now rightly regarded as one of his masterpieces, bang on the money about how our lives are shaped and how we take stock of them.’ Henry Goodman’s character, he said, ’embodies the play’s ingenious combination of flip dime-store comedy and unalloyed pathos. Those tonal fluctuations align with Miller’s interest in how the price of an object varies depending on context, and how the value of an endeavour can be subject to shifting interpretations over time.’ About Goodman, he said: ‘ “In brief, a phenomenon” Miller’s stage-note reads; he is.’

4 stars ★★★★

’the stifling weight of familial responsibility is slow-burning and powerful’ said Dave Fargnoli in his review for The Stage. He continued: ‘The playwright touches on themes of self-deception, competition and the ways in which a simplistic, money-centric view of success forces people into living lives of unfulfilling drudgery.’ He pointed out: ‘Director Jonathan Munby establishes a measured, never overly pensive rhythm, giving each taut conversation room to breathe, while ensuring the pace and the building tension don’t slacken.’ ‘Henry Goodman gives a riveting performance as mercurial octogenarian raconteur Solomon’.

Henry Goodman also attracted The Standard’s Nick Curtis’s attention. He said he  ‘superbly captures Solomon’s spirit. It’s up there with his superb Shylock in the Merchant, Tevye in Fiddler and his Billy Flynn in Chicago in terms of immersion in the role.’ He lavished praise on much of the production and was impressed by the way ‘Miller springs constant surprises. The play shouldn’t work as well as it does given the way he engineers the shift in tone around the interval, but the lulling, luring early humour sets us up perfectly for the coming sucker punch.’

Alun Hood for WhatsOnStage also wrote a tribute to Goodman: ‘It’s a stupendous, magnetic performance, one foot in the schtick of Jewish vaudeville turns and the other in the hardbitten realities of a man who has had to fight for everything he has. This is a masterclass’. He had plenty of praise too for Elliot Cowan: ‘Cowan gives a towering performance in his own right, his face clenched, body language defeated, his voice a muted growl, and his eyes kind but desperately sad. He inhabits this living embodiment of the adage that good guys come last to such an extent that his emotional breakdown, when it comes, is really tough to watch, yet you can’t look away.’

The Guardian’s Arifa Akbar talked about the play: ‘Through (the brothers‘) clashing memories, Miller captures the way in which the past is always contested within families, and between siblings. Miller makes you feel for them both, but also see how a life of illusion and wilful self-deception might be a choice. It is powerful, winding drama. You end up wondering why this angry, plaintive and deeply psychological play is not more often revived.’

The Sunday Times’ Dominic Maxwell explained : ‘really it’s the men’s story. As the workaholic Walter, Hopkins emits a George Clooney-ish urbanity that beguiles and repels. As the furrowed Victor, Cowan shows a decent man who goes all the way from cynicism to gullibility. The emotional acuity of their unpredictable debating is thrilling.’ He ended with his thoughts about Goodman: ‘ Whether venting big ideas about how we live or unexpectedly peeling a boiled egg, Goodman’s capering interloper embodies this rich story’s gorgeous contradictions. Bravo.’

3 stars ★★★

Tom Wicker for Time Out had reservations about the play: ‘While it’s thrilling to see talented actors really knock chunks out of each other, with Munby excavating every ounce of pain from their performances, a sense of drag also begins to set in, as Miller circles the same arguments.’ Nevertheless he decided: ‘there’s some seriously meaty material here about how we take ownership of our lives when value is relative. Even a lesser Miller is greater than most.’

Critics’ average rating 4.0★

The Price can be seen at Marylebone Theatre until 7 June 2026. Buy tickets directly from marylebonetheatre.com

Read Paul Seven’s review here

If you’ve seen this production of The Price, please leave your review and/or rating below