Theatre review: The Guilty with Russell Tovey

Tour-de-force from Russell Tovey in nerve-shredding drama

The Donmar Warehouse

⭑⭑⭑⭑

Russell Tovey in The Guilty. Photo: Helen Murray

It’s an on-the-edge-of-your-seat thriller. It’s a pull-the-rug-from-under-your-feet whodunit. Most of all, The Guilty is a grab-you-by-the-throat triumph for Russell Tovey.

It’s already a tense atmosphere in the Donmar because nobody is more than four rows away from the stage. Whatever is going to happen, it will right in our faces and in real time. And we know the director Felix Barrett is a master at shock and suspense- he directed Paranormal Activity as well as many a spooky immersive production from Punchdrunk.

There’s one claustrophobic set. And one actor. Joe, played by Russell Tovey, sits at a desk in the middle of the night taking police emergency calls. The rest of the room is in semi-gloom with two desks at the back shrouded in dust sheets. An overhead fluorescent tube flickers, pin prick red lights flash to flag emergencies. Frankly, I was so riveted by Tovey, I hardly noticed the rest of Alex Eales’ set, but I can say it was pretty gray and decidedly spooky. Credit too to Gareth Fry’s sound design and Anna Watson’s lighting.

Joe appears to be on this light duty, and I use the word ‘light’ advisedly, away from both his colleagues and what he might regard as real police work because he has been accused of doing something wrong. He faces a hearing the next day and is clearly upset. But is he guilty? If so, of what? We wait to find out while he takes annoyingly trivial calls.

If he’s had any training in customer service, it’s clearly forgotten or subsumed by his current problems. For example, he receives a complaint about music from a neighbour: ‘Get some f—-ing ear plugs’, he responds angrily. He’s a man on the brink but will something tip him over? We’re already feeling stressed.

We hear the people at the other end of the phone- the callers, the colleagues he needs to investigate reports, his colleague who is giving evidence in his favour, his estranged daughter and wife. Then he gets a call that sets a crisis in motion. A woman, speaking quietly and in code, tells him she has been abducted in a van. Not only that, her young children are left alone at home. Joe instigates a chase, while undertaking an unofficial remote investigation of where she is and who has taken her.

He seems to have a desperate need to be a hero, the powerful man who will save the day .

Russell Tovey in The Guilty. Photo: Helen Murray

He obtains a telephone number and is able to talk to the woman’s daughter. Like us, he constructs a story of who is guilty, and of what, around what he is hearing and what may be missing from the conversations. It feels like this opportunity is just what he needed, to help him feel good about himself.

Thanks to Russell Tovey’s extraordinarily committed performance, we feel his frustration, his anger, his panic. We are carried along with him, passengers on an unstoppable rollercoaster that is leading to a potentially tragic conclusion.

There’s no time to consider whether some of Chloë Moss‘s script may not add up (would he really be on his own, or even doing this kind of work?). You’re right in the thick of it and the stress is unbearable. Your fingers are clamped to your seat, you can feel your perspiration. When the climax arrives after quite a few twists, you are wrung out.

Only for there to be one more revelation, of a more theatrical nature, which may or may not suggest this was all in his head- a dream or a fantasy in which he hoped to redeem some of the guilt he feels. But that’s only one of many possible interpretations of this taut thriller. What is indisputable is that Russell Tovey gives a tour-de-force in a drama that could only take place in a theatre.

The Guilty can be seen at The Donmar Warehouse until 15 August 2026. Buy tickets directly from the theatre www.donmarwarehouse.com

Paul paid for his ticket.

Click here to read a roundup of other critics’ reviews

Watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Theatre review: The Truth

Stephen Mangan dominates light comedy

Apollo Theatre, Shaftesbury Avenue


⭑⭑⭑

Stephen Mangan & Janie Dee in The Truth. Photo: Johan Persson

What can I say about The Truth? No, I mean, literally, what can I say about this comedy by Florian Zeller without it being a spoiler.  I can describe the first scene to you. After that, twist follows revelation follows surprise, so much so that to say anything may be to say too much. What I can tell you is that the four actors are fabulous and funny.

So, in the first scene, we find Michel played by Stephen Mangan in bed with Alice, played by Sarah Hadland. They are having an affair. It turns out Alice’s spouse Paul is Michel’s best friend, and her lover seems more guilty about betraying her husband than his wife. In fact, he seems to think it quite normal to be commit adultery.

Six more scenes follow in which Michel meets each of the other three one at a time. In these amusing confrontations, truth sometimes seems like a lie, sometimes is a lie, and sometimes what seems like a lie turns out to be true. The second scene sets the pattern. Michel is with his wife Laurence, played by Janie Dee, who seems suspicious about what he might be up to. He gets more and more tied up in his casual lies, and stutters his way into further deceits. Even after an hour and a half without interval, some questions of what is true and what is a deception are left hanging deliciously for us to chew on as we leave.

Zeller’s companion piece The Lie, that followed The Truth a few years later and featured what appear to be the same characters, explores the notion that deception makes the world go round and truth brings it to a halt. But that’s a more serious play. This is out-and-out comedy, written before Zeller got into ‘reverse theatre’ in a big way, causing us to question truth and reality by showing us scenes from various subjective perspectives, something that reached the height of confusion in his latest play on the subject of adultery The Forest.

Without the later plays’ theatrical trickery, the thin plot is exposed. While the many twists are funny, the play relies on its lead actor to do the heavy lifting as far as the laughs are concerned. Fortunately, in Stephen Mangan, the production has a player made for the part. Unfortunately, and not his fault, his blustering becomes repetitious, and there is no character development to offset the monotony. – no sense of a lesson learned or an issue resolved.

The fun is in what the characters say and don’t say, and how they react to what they’re told. And in an extension of that, how we as an audience react knowing what we think we know, and then finding out we didn’t know after all.

Perfect casting

Ardal O’Hanlan & Stephen Mangan in The Truth. Photo: Johan Persson

The casting is perfect. Stephen Mangan is like a naughty child, crashing into situations his own constructions like a toddler learning to walk, shouting as way of defending himself, and even at one point sitting sulkily in the corner with a big bottom lip. He not only doesn’t listen to others, he doesn’t listen to himself, being so self-centred that he cannot see the hypocrisy of being outraged by the betrayal of his friend deliberately losing at tennis, but oblivious to the upset caused by the revelation of his betrayal of wife and friend. Janie Dee’s facial expressions are quite brilliant: a slight widening of her eyes becomes as revelatory as a whole speech. Ardal O’Hanlan as Paul  quietly hides behind his neat beard, displaying a tight smile and a penetrating look that could be concealing either a secret or a feeling. Even Sarah Hadland‘s emotive Alice appears to have something up the sleeve she seems to wear her heart on.

In Lizzie Clachan‘s set design, hotels, a changing room, and sitting rooms all look similarly anodyne- there is even a joke about hotel rooms looking the same- suggesting an emptiness to these characters’ lives.

There is a familiarity about the creative team. This is an excellent translation by Christopher Hampton, who has brought seven of Zeller’s plays to English speaking audiences, including most famously The Father. Director Lindsay Posner has previously directed The Truth and The Lie at The Menier, and we should probably be thankful that he moves the production with such a pace that we have no time to dwell on the some of the more unlikely or more repetitive elements of the plot.

The Truth is a straightforward play compared with Zeller’s other hits, although you can argue that it m akes some profound points about the importance of deception to human society. It may also have become more relevant in an age of media and of leaders who give equal weight to lies and truth.

I think I’ve said enough.

The Truth can be seen as the Apollo Theatre in Shaftesbury Avenue, London, until 12 September 2026. Buy tickets directly from www.thetruthplay.com

Paul paid for his ticket.

Watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Read a roundup of other theatre critics’ reviews of The Truth (with ratings ranging from 2 to 5 stars) here

Theatre review: Cyrano de Bergerac

Adrian Lester as Cyrano is funny, lyrical and tragic, often all at once

Noel Coward Theatre


⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑

Adrian Lester as Cyrano de Bergerac. Photo: Marc Brenner

I have rarely enjoyed a night as good as this in a theatre. This new adaptation of Cyrano de Bergerac first seen in Stratford and now in London pays homage to the language of poetry, and provides a uniquely theatrical experience. Best of all, it features a performance by Adrian Lester to rank among the greats. He is funny, lyrical and tragic, often all at the same time.

I last saw him as Othello in 2013 at the National Theatre, when he won an Olivier Award for Best Actor, and I don’t believe he’s been in a fully staged play in the UK since. Which is a loss to those of us who love great acting.

It was his idea, apparently, to play Cyrano de Bergerac. And you can see the attraction: an awesome anti-hero possessed of supreme swordmanship, a quick wit and a poet’s passion for language, but cursed with a tragic flaw- he is convinced his large nose makes him an unattractive laughing stock.

Of course, the story of a man who is so self loathing that he cannot declare himself to the woman he loves and instead woos her through a proxy has become one of the most familiar in the world since it was written by Edmond Rostand at the end of the 19th century. Thankfully, this adaptation doesn’t attempt to modernise the narrative. In fact it sticks pretty closely to the original, even to the setting in 17th century France. What makes it special is the translation into modern poetry by Simon Evans, who also directs, and Debris Stevenson, poet and author of one of my favourite recent musicals Poet In Da Corner. She was brought in to provide the actual poems within the play but she has clearly contributed to the whole script with a dazzling display of wordplay.

Just as the original play was written in verse, so much of  the dialogue is here is based on classical poetic metres, but each character has his or her own rhythm and use of language. I can’t convey to you how well this is done. but here is a sample of the verse. Cyrano talking as he faces battle: ‘This is what words mean here: / Not beauty. Not art. But armour. / Words that hold the line when hands can’t. /That give the dying something to chant. / That beat across time like a giant’s drum, / and say: I was here and I was Loved and I was someone.’ I didn’t scribble them down while watching the show- I was so impressed by the script that I bought a copy!

The adaptation squeezes every drop of comedy out of the play as well. We first meet Cyrano in a theatre, the theatre we’re in. Someone introduces a show we’re apparently about to see. There’s clearly some nervousness that Cyrano might turn up. Actors looking for him appear all over the place- in the boxes, at the back of the stalls, leaning over the circle, sitting among the audience. (Try doing that in the cinema.) And instantly we’re involved.

When Cyrano does appear he’s accompanied by a six piece band. He won them in a bet about grammar, what else? Sometimes they play at his command, sometimes they play when he doesn’t want them to, but mainly they play sublime music by Alex Baranowski that enhances the emotions being expressed by the characters.

He gets into an argument with Valvert, a stooge of his arch enemy the Comte De Guiche. Cyrano is disappointed that the best insult about his nose that antagonist can come up with is ‘It’s fucking huge’. Apart from the fact that we go on to witness one of the best stage sword fights I’ve seen, Cyrano decides to accompany it with an acrostic. He explains that he’s going to take each letter of that insulting phrase and make it the beginning of a whole line about his nose. So- ‘F: Look Papa Geppetto, I’m a Real boy. U: Utilitarian- what’s it for? Hanging coats, putting out candles, herding wild goats? C: Capricious – should we worship it, for fear it might destroy us? K: Kinky – Do women moan if you pull it out mid-coitus?’ And so on. But before that,  he gets us, the audience, panto-style, to join in and remind him of the insult.

Susannah fielding and Adrian Lester in Cyrano de Bergerac. Photo: Marc Brenner

Now, I don’t know how funny I’ve made this sound but I can assure you that when it’s done by Adrian Lester, it’s hilarious. The deftness of the dialogue is present throughout. When he meets Roxane, the woman he loves and whom he has known since childhood, they play a word game, constructing a conversation where all the words begin with the same letter. She apparently has something to tell him, so here’s some of the repartee: ‘Some secret?’ ‘Soon.’ ‘Straightaway.’ ‘Stop searching.’ ‘Silence?’ ‘Suspense.’ ‘Stubborn!’ and so it goes on.

Words, which are both Cyrano’s power and his protection, carry us through the play like a trip down the rapids. It all goes wrong when Cyrano, convinced he cannot possibly be attractive to Roxane, decides to assist a new recruit to his rag tag cohort, a farmer called Christian, in wooing her. She has told her old friend that she finds Christian attractive but it is the words supplied to him by Cyrano with which she falls in love. Now, I know this sounds unlikely, but, then,  think of the verses in greetings cards that people use to express the feelings they cannot.

Christian himself is only be able to speak ‘plain, rough, simple, small’ words of love which are totally inadequate to her ears. He does actually appreciate some words- he has learnt the collective nouns for animals. So, when Roxane exhorts him to come up with a word other than the cliché ‘love’, in desperation he tells her ‘The collective noun for wildebeests is a confusion’. The door slams in his face. Roxane falls for Christian through the words of Cyrano, foolishly believing that good looks and a poet’s art go hand-in-hand. Ironically, she even realises that there is ‘a strange darkness lingering’ behind the flattery of the poems, she detects that the writer ‘hates the world in which he loves me’.

This quality of script means each actor is given the tools to be exceptional and the cast rise to the occasion. Susannah Fielding as Roxane is suitably bolshy and arrogant, so relaxed in Cyrano’s company and so blinded by the idea of romantic poetry that she loses touch with what is in front of her. My only caveat is that she doesn’t convey sufficiently the sadness of her situation.

Levi Brown as Christian could easily be eclipsed by the remarkable repartee of the two stars but he is perfect as the cheeky, naive farm boy with a big bursting heart. Scott Handy is superb as Comte de Guiche, sly and slimy but never overplaying the villain, always suggesting a sensitivity beneath the sneer. Greer Dale-Foulkes is a joy as Roxane’s randy servant Abigail. And Philip Cumbus and Christian Patterson are heartwarming as Cyrano’s faithful friends.

And what a production. Grace Smart‘s set is just right. At the back, various flats suggesting a theatre, a tavern, a courtyard, and, as we move to the finale, a battlefield and a garden. No gimmicks, just sensitive support for the story. The lighting too, designed by Joshie Harriette, bathes the various scenes in beautiful colours.

We move to war and tragedy. Then, far too late, Roxane and Cyrano realise how they have deceived themselves. We are told right at the beginning that our time in the theatre offers us ‘precious moments. The world out there. Us, quiet in here.’ To take time out from the cares of the world and immerse ourselves in the life of Adrian Lester’s Cyrano is a privilege.

Cyrano de Bergerac can be seen at the Noel Coward theatre until 5 September 2026. Buy tickets directly from the theatre 

Paul was given a review ticket by the producers.

Watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Theatre review: Kiss of the Spiderwoman

A musical to rival Cabaret and Chicago

MAST Southampton


⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑

Fabian Soto Pacheco, Anna-Jane Casey and George Blagden in Kiss of the Spiderwoman. Photo: Marc Brenner

John Kander and Fred Ebb are best known for writing Cabaret and Chicago. Their musical Kiss of the Spiderwoman is far less familiar.  Adapted from the novel by Manuel Puig, it premiered in  the West End in  1992 before transferring to Broadway in 1993 where it won seven Tony Awards including Best Musical.  I can’t believe it’s not performed more often.The score, infused with evocative Latin rhythms, stirs deep emotions, while story is profoundly moving, not to mention harrowing. This co-production by Bristol Old Vic, Leicester Curve and Southampton MAST is tremendous.

This revival is far more intimate than the apparently spectacular premiere over thirty years ago. But no way is it a cut price version. The set entirely befits what is ultimately a love story. The setting is a prison cell in 1970s Argentina, shared by Valentin, a political prisoner, and Molina, a gay man.

These were dark times in that country. The growth of fascism shown in Cabaret is fully developed here, the celebrity prisoners of Chicago are now wretched victims of the governments of Juan Peron’s widow and the subsequent military junta of General Galtieri. Trades unionists, left wingers and gay people face imprisonment, torture or, notoriously, become The Disappeared.

Seeking refuge from the brutality of prison life, Molina, played by Fabian Soto Pacheco and wearing soft feminine garments, transports himself to his childhood memories of movies featuring a screen goddess called Aurora. As he recounts the plots of these films, the star materialises before us singing and dancing.

David Woodhead’s set brilliantly contrasts the austere greyness of the cell and its two narrow beds and floor to ceiling iron bars, with the colourful glamour of Aurora and her fabulous costumes, designed by Gabriella Slade. She appears as a mature woman, presumably reflecting a child’s perception of the movie star as much older than himself.

Anna-Jane Casey is charismatic in the role, commanding the stage with her swaggering dance and her seductive smile. Projected at the back of the stage are scenes from her black-and-white movies, cleverly created by Andrzej Goulding.

George Blagden delivers a compelling performance as Valentin. As an idealistic revolutionary, and a heterosexual, he is initially indifferent or even hostile to Molina but comes to value the escape into ‘beauty and love’, as the latter describes it. The movies and their songs become more meaningful to him than the ideological book by Karl Marx he keeps by him.

Both sing and act well.   Molina is vulnerable and pragmatic,  Valentin tough and principled. Although both remain attached to loved ones outside the prison walls, their love for each other grows, as both recognise and appreciate the strengths of the other. Inevitably we think of fluidity of gender and sexuality.

The prison authorities attempt to exploit this developing relationship to pressure Molina into extracting information about Valentin’s associates.

What follows is a gripping struggle within Molina between love and self preservation. Throughout, the movies (a metaphor for all art), not only provide escape from life but a blueprint for how to live

All the acting is top class but I’ll mention Jay Rincon as the cunning, sadistic Prison Warder.  His chilling performance sends a shudder down the spine and makes the scenes of violence that much more believable.

This production, directed by Paul Foster, serves as a timely reminder to people like me who spend most of our time in London theatres that regional productions can be as artistically accomplished, emotionally powerful and theatrically thrilling as anything the capital has to offer.

Kiss of the Spiderwoman completes its short tour at The MAST Southampton on 6 June 2026. 

Paul paid for his ticket.

Watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Theatre review: Paddington The Musical

Paddington Bear’s secret weapon that turns an ordinary musical into a great one

Savoy Theatre


⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑

Paddington The Musical at Savoy Theatre. Photo: Johan Persson

Paddington The Musical without Paddington would be just, well, The Musical. Then we’d notice that the plot, taken from the first film, is a bit flimsy. Tom Fletcher’s songs tend toward the generic. Some of the effects are a bit panto for a musical spectacular. But, transported on a wave of love for the little bear from Peru, the show is determined that you will be moved by its message of kindness, caring and tolerance. Forget any criticism, resistance is futile. You are overcome by a script from Jessica Swales that’s as sweet as marmalade.

Although tolerance is a theme of Michael Bond’s books, Paddington has become a focus for a kinder Britain. The bear is now a hymn to multicultural London and this tale of an illegal immigrant seems like a riposte to people who promote hate of those who simply seek a better life on our shores. ‘It doesn’t matter that he’s a different species’ declares Mr Brown. ‘Everyone is different, and everyone can fit in,’ says Paddington. I fear if the Reform Party forms a government, they’ll bring down the curtain!

It helps that the cast are so enthusiastic. They sell the show like chuggers in the high street. And then, there is the bear himself. A superbly conceived ‘skin’, as they say in theatrical circles when describing outfits that completely cover the actor. It’s a bit like the costumes they use in The Masked Singer but here Paddington is a perfect physical realisation of Peggy Fortnum‘s original drawings. Designed by Tahra Zafar, it is moved from within by an actual human (a brilliant Abbie Purvis on the night I saw it, but usually Arti Shah) with eye and mouth movements operated off stage by James Hameed who also provides his voice (and is occasionally seen on stage in strange meta moments). Between them, they make the bear as alive as any of the actors around him.

The Brown family are just what you expect. Adrian Der Gregorian is the risk averse but increasingly confident father and Amy Ellen Richardson the creative, rebellious mother.  Bonnie Langford as the lodger Mrs Bird is astonishingly good, not only a musical legend with a powerful voice but still knocking out splits and high kicks at the age of 61. Victoria Hamilton-Barritt with a deeply reverberating voice is so frightening as Paddington’s would-be stuffer that I’ suspect younger children will be hiding under their seat. Teddy Kempner is a loveable Mr Gruber. Timi Akinyosade, Amy Booth-Steel, Tom Edden and Tarrin Callender all add to the fun.

Tom Pye‘s pretty set designs make clever use of projections which soak the stage in colourful images, and there are back projected drawings which remind us of Paddington’s literary origins. And Director Luke Sheppard keeps the whole thing moving at a pace, even if the final chase becomes a bit haphazard.

Paddington is an innocent creature who offers unconditional love and trust. What kind of cold-hearted cynic wouldn’t return that love, and take care of this bear?

Paddington The Musical can be seen at the Savoy Theatre in London’s West End. Paul advises booking at least six months in advance to obtain the best prices.
Paul paid for his ticket.

Watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Click here to read a roundup of other critics’ reviews of Paddington The Musical 

 

Theatre review: Stage Kiss

Play within a play tickles both brain and funny bone

Ambassadors theatre


⭑⭑⭑⭑

Myanna Buring & Patrick Kennedy in Stage Kiss. Photo: Helen Murray

We start with an audition. It takes place under full house lights, so, before we think about hiding in the darkness and immersing ourselves in the play, we’re reminded we’re in a theatre, and the people on stage are all actors. Don’t worry, the lights soon go down. We find out the play is going to involve kissing. What we don’t realise at this point is the blurring of boundaries between actors pretending to kiss and actors pretending to be pretending to kiss. In the first act we watch rehearsals and part of the performance of a revival of an dreadful 1930s musical comedy. Since the stilted dialogue can only be performed in a pompous way, you could say it’s a meal of corn and ham.

The spoof of a Cary Grant/Katharine Hepburn style screwball comedy is amusing and the mishaps of the rehearsals are genuinely funny.  There’s a director played by Rolf Saxon who refuses to direct (‘Follow your instincts’ he says), props waiting to be tripped over, songs that burst out from nowhere. Having said that, it’s not in the class of the great behind-the-scenes farce Noises Off.  In fact, I was getting a little bored with the theatrical in-jokes. Then it got a lot more interesting.

Stage Kiss is a clever comedy that delves into the nature of art. It turns out the two leads met years earlier and had a torrid affair, which is now reigniting, even as their characters in the play revive their earlier love. It is fascinating that what happens on stage becomes reality off stage, while conversely the actors’ real life affects their performance. The two leads are referred to as She and He, and the director as, well, The Director. Does this make them anonymous lumps of clay that authors and audiences can mould into whatever sculpture we like? Maybe.  Certainly, both change as the evening progresses, as does the setting. At first Myanna Buring as She is a ditzy blonde, then she’s a dominating actor. then she’s a broken woman. Patrick Kennedy as He is passionate, then arrogant, then childish.

The author Sarah Ruhl is definitely toying with the confusion between art and life. We are after all watching actors in a play pretending to be pretending to be kissing. At one point I was thinking He went off with She’s daughter in real life until I remembered that happened in the first play within the play.

In the second act, the two actors are living together and get involved in another not terribly good play this time set in the gritty 1970s but with dialogue to match that seems implausible to today’s ears. Once again the cast are convincing at being unconvincing.  A more aggressive relationship in the play reflects the lovers’ new real life issues. It’s all very meta theatre.

The kiss is key, because, while the two plays-within-a-play are awful, the kisses between He and She within them appear to be what we might call in the context real. This is made clear when the under-talented understudy, a delightfully goofy performance by James Phoon, tries to kiss She and looks like a python about to devour its victim. She then demonstrates how to kiss, using another cast member played by Jill Winternitz who subtly indicates how genuinely moved she is by the experience. But we can’t forget what is presented as authentic is still well rehearsed acting. To get all the levels to work so well is a considerable achievement by the actors and director Blanche McIntyre.

Just to throw us off balance further, the husband in the first play and the real husband in act two are played by the same actor, a calm, tolerant character on both sides of the curtain, performed to perfection by Oliver Dimsdale. The role The Husband plays in the twist is a reminder from the author that art is manipulation. It can fulfil our fantasies or reflect our more prosaic life.

The set begins as a bare rehearsal room but gradually fills up until designer  Robert Innes Hopkins presents us with a believable stage set for a 1930s play, and then a naturalistic apartment with a messy bed, that subsequently becomes another stage set.

This reinforces what Sarah Ruhl seems to be saying: that art and life merge in our own brains. “All the world’s a stage.” We create a story of our lives inside our heads and we bring real emotions to our experience of art. The problem I had with this funny and thoughtful piece of art is that the fate of the three principals didn’t arouse enough emotions in me. Even so, it is a pleasure to have one’s brain tickled as well as one’s funny bone.

Stage Kiss can be seen at Hampstead Theatre until 13 June 2026. Buy tickets directly from the theatre

Paul was given a review ticket by the theatre

Watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Read the roundup of other critics’ reviews

Theatre review: 1536

Delightful and devastating, controlled and convincing drama

Ambassadors Theatre


⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑

Tanya Reynolds, Siena Kelly, Liv Hill in 1536. Photo: Helen Murray

Don’t be fooled by the posters showing women in smart Tudor dresses. SIX it ain’t. 1536 is the year Henry the 8th accused his wife Anne Boleyn of treason and killed her. Ava Pickett’s play imagines the effect this might have had on women at the lowest levels of society, and, by implication, how the behaviour of powerful men today might influence other men in their attitude to women. And what a well written, superbly acted drama, it is.

It looks at three, I suppose we’d call them, peasant women- their camaraderie, their mutual support, and their ultimate downfall at the hands of men, who are emboldened by the King’s actions. It starts out with some very funny scenes as Ava Pickett’s fast-moving, scintillating dialogue establishes the characters of the women, but it ends in overwhelming tragedy.

Anna played by Siena Kelly enjoys sex. She knows she looks attractive and makes sure she exploits what she sees as an asset. It’s her power over men. She has a sharp tongue and a ribbing sense of humour. The butt of her jokes is usually Jane, played by Liv Hill, Anna’s polar opposite: slow-witted, shy and a virgin. Tanya Reynolds plays the conciliatory Mariella, a worldly midwife saddened by thwarted ambitions.

It’s a joyous portrait of female friendship. The conversation between them is so easy and natural- they speak like modern Essex women (Ms Pickett is from Colchester), which adds to the sense that you could bump into them on a night out.

Then they are shaken by the news (two days old) that the King has imprisoned the Queen. They find it impossible to believe. Inevitably rumours abound but the word is she has had many lovers, including her brother. She may even have plotted to assassinate the monarch. Can it be true? It doesn’t matter. If the King says it is, it must be.

We meet two of the men in their lives. Richard, played by Oliver Johnstone, is one of Anna’s lovers, even while he is courting Jane (for her dowry). George Kemp is William, a married property owner who has a relationship with Mariella. Both appear to be mild mannered.

When things start to go wrong, the male hierarchy follows the King’s example. Anna is labelled a whore while Richard is seen as having been seduced. The other two are also treated badly and (what’s new?) not believed. It’s clear men call the shots and the play proceeds to become very dark indeed, as the bonds with men on which the women relied start to break. As in any oppressive society, the oppressed women not only take the blame for men’s wrongs but start to turn on each other.

It would be so good to be able to say how much society has changed. Shamefully, far too many of today’s powerful men set an example of verbal and physical abuse of women.

Tender and tragic

Liv Hill, Siena Kelly & Tanya Reynolds in 1536. Photo: Helen Murray

All this is acted out on a single set cleverly designed by Max Jones. Clumps of dry trodden down grass, a dead tree and scrubby bushes symbolise the oppressive country. It is meant to be excessively hot, and we feel the heat that is beating the women down at the same time as it stirs the men to cheer the execution of the King’s wife without ever questioning her guilt. Then as now people in power control the information, and gossip (for which read social media) whips up the fake news.

The lighting by Jack Knowles contributes to the atmosphere, and between scenes plunges us into impenetrable blackouts that parallel the darkness in which the local population is kept.

It’s a stunning achievement for a debut play. Credit to the Genesis Almeida scheme for commissioning it, and to the Almeida for this pacey production directed by Lyndsey Turner. West End transfers from small theatres sometimes don’t work but the Ambassadors is appropriately intimate. 1536 is tender and tragic, delightful and devastating, controlled and convincing.

1536 can be seen at The Ambassadors Theatre until 1 August 2026.

Paul was given a review ticket by the producer.

Read a roundup of other critics’ reviews of 1536 here

Click here to watch a video of this review on the YouTube cahnnel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Theatre review: Mass

Grief, guilt & hope in gripping play about a school shooting

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑

Adeel Akhtar, Lyndsey Marshal, Monica Dolan & Paul Hilton in Mass. Photo: Richard Hubert Smith

Two couples meet six years after a mass school shooting in the USA that left both their teenage sons dead. In this gripping play about grief, parental love, anger and forgiveness, there are depths of emotion in Fran Kranz‘s Mass that are hard for those of us watching to take. There were moments when I felt I couldn’t breathe. I don’t think I have never been among an audience so quiet.

The production is an extraordinary coming together of script, direction, design and acting. First, the cast. There are some actors so magnetic that they dominate a play with their star quality. Then there are actors- sometimes called character actors- who are so good at immersing themselves in a role that they become one among equals. That’s not to say that the main actors in Mass can’t lead a play- they can and have- but what is valuable about them in an ensemble play like this is that they don’t bring baggage. And that enables you yourself to become immersed in what seems like a real conversation told verbatim.

A couple who lost their son are meeting the couple whose son was the shooter and who killed himself. Jay and Gail, parents of their murdered boy Evan, bring grief and anger to the round table and confront the parents of the killer. Inevitable questions are asked: did they not realise their son was a potential killer, couldn’t they have done something to prevent it? In response, Richard and Linda express their sorrow, their incomprehension at how their son Hayden became a killer, and their own guilty grief at his loss.

Adeel Akhtar‘s Jay is clearly a civilised, liberal man- he offers water and worries about recycling- but at times cannot control the animosity he feels. Lyndsey Marshal‘s Gail is an empty shell. Paul Hilton‘s Richard is stiff and defensive but has a downcast face, racked with sorrow. Monica Dolan‘s Linda is so upset at what became of her little boy that her tears seem wrenched from deep inside her. Both mothers are especially moving when they remember their sons as young children.

You can’t look away from this impeccable production

Mass at The Donmar. Photo: Richard Hubert Smith

It is essential to maintaining the tension that there is no break in continuity in Carrie Cracknell‘s impeccable production, so the participants remain seated for nearly the whole exchange. That’s rare in itself because so many directors seem to make the actors walk up and down just to keep it interesting. Consequently, to avoid us having to look at the back of someone’s head the whole time, there is a revolve that moves imperceptibly but turns them round regularly so we get to see all their faces, and you can’t look away from all the pain they are expressing.

The play is set in the meeting room of a church, ironically a soulless piece of modern architecture with lots of glass and light but no human touch. This is expertly conjured by designer Anna Yates, who shows us the mundane kitchen and corridors and stairs outside the room. As if to emphasise the way something extraordinary can happen in the middle of something quite everyday, at the start and end of the play, the room is set up and cleared by other characters played by Rochelle Rose, Amari Bacchus and Susie Trayling.

This is not a play of despair. Yes, Fran Kranz, who made the 2021 film on which this is based, examines reactions to tragedy, but he also explores the concept of restorative justice. This is where the play takes on a greater dimension. We may not live in the USA- mass killings are far less common here in the UK. They do happen nevertheless. But we are also part of a world in which war and terrorism breed more of the same. And at an individual level, people cope with the results of knife attacks, dangerous driving and more. Loss leaves people seeking retribution, but the resultant resentment and revenge can destroy us. Reconciliation, where the perpetrators admit their guilt and the victims forgive, offers hope that, instead of being consumed by grief, the parents can live alongside it. There is no sense that this is an easy or a complete answer but the understanding the couples gain about each other in the course of the play offers the prospect of peace.

This is an important play. Fran Kranz, Carrie Cracknell and the extraordinary cast of Mass have given us an insight into the anguish of loss and the possibility of hope. The characters may be made up, but the tears we shed at the end are real.

Mass can be seen at the Donmar Warehouse theatre in London until 6 June 2026. Tickets from https://www.donmarwarehouse.com/
Paul paid for his ticket.

Click here to watch the video of this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

Theatre review: Magic

Not enough magic in David Haig’s tense drama

Chichester Festival Theatre

⭑⭑⭑

Hadley Fraser, Jenna Augen & David Haig in Magic. Photo: Manuel Harlan

Magic- the art of creating something believable that seems inexplicable. The magic of an illusionist like Houdini. The magic of spiritualism. The magic of actors creating real people.  There are many kinds of magic explored and linked in David Haig‘s play Magic at Chichester Festival Theatre, about the time Sir Arthur Conan Doyle met Harry Houdini. The concept is genuinely interesting, and well acted. But is it magical theatre? I’m afraid not quite.

The play is about a search for truth (something even more urgent today than then, I suspect). Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, and Houdini, the world’s greatest illusionist, form a friendship because both are genuinely interested in whether those they love live on after death. They both would like spiritualism to be the answer. Doyle, the creator Sherlock Holmes, turns out to be far more gullible than Houdini, who is cynical because he is well versed in the tricks of his own trade.

First a word about spiritualism. It was a religious movement, popular in the US and the UK, that gained a lot of traction after the First World War when people were grieving for dead sons, not to mention the many who died in the great Influenza outbreak of 1919. More than a simple belief in ghosts, spiritualists at the time thought that the spirits of people who die live on in the afterlife and can be contacted to guide or comfort us, through mediums. Already a spiritualist, Sir Arthur became an even more fervent believer after the loss of members of his family, in particular his beloved son Kingsley who was killed in the Great War. Houdini was devoted to his dead mother and dearly wished to be able to communicate with her.

It’s a drama loosely based on a true story. The true bit being that Doyle and Houdini formed a friendship back in the 1920s, based on mutual admiration and a common interest in the afterlife.  In the play, it becomes strained because Doyle’s obession with spiritualism led him to refuse to believe evidence that magic did not exist (he was even convinced that some of Houdini’s tricks involved genuine dematerialisation). The illusionist showed an equally obsessive determination to expose fake mediums’ ruses. Unfortunately for their friendship, this included the medium who apparently united Doyle with his dead son, and the writer’s own wife who pretended to receive messages from beyond the grave. In real life, they became distant enemies but in the play their residual mutual admiration means they maintain a fractious friendship that adds a real tension to the drama. That’s a trick of the writer’s trade- conflict being the driver of great stories.

David Haig, who wrote the script, plays Doyle. Hadley Fraser is Houdini. The pair exude both warmth and grief.  Haig plays Doyle as a good chap, who, as an ex-public schoolboy, has been taught to contain his complex emotions, but can’t hold back his enthusiasm and his desperation. One of the many tricks of his trade as an actor is a twinkly-eyed smile that he deploys to magical effect. Hadley Fraser is appropriately stocky, pugilistic, thin-skinned and burning with passion, much like a bulldog puppy.

Tricks of the trade

Jenna Augen and Claire Price provide sharp depictions of their highly supportive wives, Bess Houdini and Jean Conan Doyle. Although the humorous down-to-earth New Yorker and buttoned-up middle class Brit are in sharp contrast, they too form a friendship, and provide us with a useful break from the intensity of the main characters. Jade Williams is a suitably melodramatic medium.

There is poignancy to the play. It shows us the depths of grief and what it can do to us, be it heartbreak or obsession. So there is theatrical magic in the story of these two characters’ friendship, and that’s where David Haig’s script and Lucy Bailey‘s production scores. Where it goes wrong is when it tries to show us the magic of seances and illusions.

We can only imagine the spectacle and showmanship of Houdini’s shows. Trying to show us this on the limitations of a theatre budget is a mistake. We begin with Houdini performing one of his great escapes- he is suspended upside down while releasing himself from handcuffs. Far from causing my jaw to drop, all I could manage was a shrug. If he’d been in chains and underwater, then maybe… Similarly, near the end, he appears to walk through a brick wall, but of course it’s a piece of scenery, presumably made of wood not brick, and there isn’t time for the kind of buildup that Houdini would have given such a main event.  Having said that, there are many lovely little touches, for example when Harry is sitting chatting and casually makes a playing card appear and disappear in his hand. Credit to illusion designer John Bullein.

A couple of seances are recreated, and are more comical than spine-tingling, Carrying them out partly in the dark simply left me in the dark as to how Doyle could fall for them.

Add to this, Chichester’s large thrust stage is set out with a proscenium arch at the back to remind us, that Houdini’s act and the seances, and indeed the play itself, are all theatre. Joanna Parker‘s design is lovely but again a low budget of four or five vaudeville showgirls moving lightweight scenery around doesn’t make for theatrical magic. I’m sad to say, it just looks half baked.

A difficult decision no doubt, but I think this intimate drama would have worked better in Chichester’s smaller Minerva Theatre.

Magic can be seen at Chichester Festival Theatre until 16 May 2026. Buy tickets directly from the theatre
Paul was given a review ticket by the theatre.

Click here to watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

 

 

 

 

Theatre review: The Price with Henry Goodman

Veteran actor steals the show

Marylebone Theatre


⭑⭑⭑⭑

Henry Goodman in The Price. Photo: Mark Senior

What a coup for the 270-seat, three-and-a-half year old Marylebone Theatre, managing to attract theatrical great Henry Goodman to perform in Arthur Miller’s The Price. Director Jonathan Munby has put together a marvellously tense production populated by a  perfect cast.

In the first minutes, we meet Vic and his wife Esther and find out pretty much everything we need to know about what is going to unfold. There’s the obsession with placing a monetary value on everything- Vic has cinema tickets: “Better be great” he says, “Two-fifty apiece”. It seems everything has a price in a country built on capitalism, as the socialist Miller saw it. Even the unhappiness explored in the play stems from the financial crash of 1929.

The questions are already there- how much was Vic forced to do what he did with his life, how much was his choice? Now he’s turned 50 and can retire and pursue a more satisfying career, will he have the confidence to do it? They could do with money but will he accept help from his brother? He’s here to sell their late father’s possessions to a dealer, but will he drive a hard bargain? We suspect not.

Enter Gregory Solomon. He is there to assess the furniture and other objects, but this wily salesman is clearly also assessing who he is dealing with. So, let me tell you about 75 year old Henry Goodman as 89 year old Gregory Solomon. About a quarter way into the play, he comes on stage, wheezing and coughing. He appears frail but is full of life.  His character is fully rounded and we can’t help but be seduced by his stories and homilies. Even when the way his eyes shiftily scan the room, or he stiffens as he refuses to let go of the opportunity to make one last deal suggest his dithering charm may be an act. Once Esther is out of the room, he laughs and ingratiates himself with Vic. By the end of act one he has taken charge and undoubtedly conned the other man out of what he should rightfully be receiving. I could be talking about how Henry Goodman steals the show.

It’s almost a shame for Elliot Cowan, who plays Vic, because he is so good at conveying his character’s weakness, stubbornness, and love. His expressive face glowers or smiles, his eyes stare into the distance in suspicion or pain, almost begging the audience to empathise.  So convincing was he that I could hardly restrain myself from calling out in frustration: “Stop being so pig-headed.” Mr Cowan should be getting all the accolades at the end of the show, but Henry Goodman is so phenomenally good, that he dominates a play in which he is barely on stage for more than a quarter of the time.

In 1968, when the play was first produced, the USA was mired in the Vietnam War, and alternative ways of thinking about how to value life, other than by monetary price, were being considered.  ”We worry about it, we talk about it, but we can’t seem to want it.” says Esther about money. What’s bugging her and Vic is, when the brothers grew up, Walter went to college and pursued a successful career as a surgeon, while Vic stayed home to look after his widowed father. In doing so, he took on a relatively low paid job as a cop, which he hates. The resentment has led to an estrangement between the brothers. Esther, played by Faye Castelow, supports her husband but berates him too, in a nicely balanced expression of marital love and frustration.

Riveting dialogue

Henry Goodman & Elliot Cowan in The Price. Photo: Mark Senior

All the action takes place in an attic that was once the impoverished family’s home after the father’s wealth was wiped out. Among the furniture are two chests. One was Vic’s, one his brother’s. Significantly, they are on opposite sides of the room. Jon Bausor‘s naturalistic set is just as depicted in Miller’s script: no clever interpretation by a director trying to make their mark.  It makes full use of the Marylebone Theatre’s large proscenium arch stage and crams it full of old furniture, dusty, dimly lit, claustrophobic. It’s so overwhelming, you feel you’re in the room with these people.

Having shown how Vic’s lack of a killer instinct is manipulated by Solomon in the first act, the second act concentrates on the confrontation between Vic and  Walter, with Esther periodically supporting her brother-in-law and jabbing at her husband, and Solomon popping in occasionally to make a conciliatory comment.

The brothers’ conversation is riveting, as they go round in circles, edging nearer and nearer to the facts about what happened to shape both their lives. In this respect, the format is typical Miller but no less engaging for that, even if the dialogue is overly portentous at times. What separates it for the earlier classics like Death of a Salesman, All My Sons and A View From The Bridge is that there is no devastating revelation, more a profound reflection on the paths we take.

Each brother has a different view of past events. They learn from each other the truth about the price they have both had to pay for choices made, and how they subsequently blamed others for those choices. Each took “different roads out of the same trap”, as Walter puts it, but became unhappy in the new traps they found themselves in. Walter has reached a clearer view than Vic about the past, and John Hopkins conveys brilliantly his broken dreams and  desperate wish to reconcile with his brother.

We also learn that, in relation to his wife and sons, their father may have been a con man, not dissimilar to Solomon.  Walter says of their parents: “What was unbearable is not that it fell apart, it was that there was never anything here.” And (back to money): “There was nothing (…) but a straight financial arrangement.”

There is no sense in which their lives will greatly change, only perhaps that they may live more comfortably with themselves in the present, much in the way Solomon does. For him, the past is like a dream, and the present rewrites the past. As he says, “Good luck you can never know until the last minute.”

Arthur Miller, despite having strong political views, is not a writer to lay things out in black and white, as good or bad. Each character is a complex human being with complicated relationships and, like all his great work, The Price gives no simplistic analysis of the brothers’ lives. Repeated viewings are rewarded with ever deeper understanding of human nature and society, especially when performed by actors who can plumb those depths.

Elliot Cowan should be a contender for Best Leading Actor awards but, if there’s any justice, Henry Goodman has Best Supporting Actor in the bag.

The Price can be seen at Marylebone Theatre until 7 June 2026. Buy tickets directly from the theatre

Paul was given a review ticket by the theatre.

Slight revisions (in italic) were made to this review on 30 April 2026.

Read a roundup of other critics’ reviews here

Click here to watch this review on the YouTube channel Theatre Reviews With Paul Seven

×